The Tale of the Two Seventeenth Holes
In a perverse way way it was comforting that Dr Karl Morris described Louis Oosthuizen’s golf mind as being “scrambled” and “a mess” prior to The Open Championship. It proves to us ordinary golfers that even the elite sometimes have a difficult time focusing correctly on and off the golf course.
Both the US Open and The Open Championship in 2010 illustrated another interesting facet of mental golf.
The seventeenth holes at Pebble Beach and The Old Course came in for some criticism from the players and media alike when they were stiffened to provide a greater test with claims that it was bordering on the impossible to get the ball near with a long iron. The holes are a very tough par 3 and 4 respectively and obviously had the potential to have a massive impact on the outcome of the championships.
But what if these holes had been a par 4 and a par 5? Would they pros have approached them any differently? In theory they shouldn’t have after all the object of the game is to get the ball in the hole in the least number of shots possible so it doesn’t really matter what the par is on the scorecard.
I contend that concentrating on the number that you are “supposed” to score on a hole can cause unnecessary expectations and pressures and that by plotting a sensible route around the course, irrespective of the “recommended” par figure, golfers would score better. Pros & amateurs alike.





